Home › News › Boulder & County News
Louisville council supports RV ordinance
STORY TOOLS
More Boulder & County News
- Gay rights advocates picket Boulder cineplex
- Boulder resident launches atheist billboard campaign
- Jury selection under way in murder trial
Share and Enjoy [?]
The Louisville City Council on Tuesday indicated support for an ordinance that governs parking recreational vehicles on private property, but deferred the vote for two weeks so guidelines could be created for residents who want to seek variances.
“We need to have rules and we need to have boundaries,” said councilwoman Frost Yarnell.
The new ordinance would replace a previous one that wasn’t enforced because of controversy over its intent and effects.
It would allow a maximum of two recreational vehicles, including boats and trailers, to be parked outside of a garage or main driveway on private property. The law also sets guidelines for where on the property those vehicles can be parked and limits their length to 32 feet.
Former Mayor Tom Davidson suspended enforcement of the original 2002 ordinance amid complaints from residents who said it’s none of the city’s business what they park on their own property. The ordinance was formally repealed about a year ago. City staff members then gathered public input and worked to draft the new ordinance.
The original law prohibited detached trailers from being parked in residential front yards for more than 72 hours.
While the new law would allow residents to park trailers in their front yards, it would require those vehicles to be on a paved driveway or an improved surface, such as gravel or a concrete pad, next to a paved driveway.
The proposed law also stipulates that trailers parked in a side yard be screened by a six-foot, solid fence. Guests also would be allowed to live in a recreational vehicle parked at a residence for a maximum of 14 days in a six-month period.
The council directed staff to remove a requirement for a five-foot setback from neighboring properties for recreational vehicles parked in a side yard or backyard at the request of Old Town residents who live on small lots. The council also asked to add a sidewalk setback for those parked in front yards.
Several people spoke against the ordinance, saying it could force them to park their trailers on the street, creating a safety issue.
Resident Randy Luallin said it’s unnecessary given that there’s only been half a dozen complaints about recreational vehicles in the last six years.
“That’s a small number that doesn’t require an ordinance,” he said. “It has nothing to do with public safety.”
He suggested grandfathering in those who have recreational vehicles that exceed the size limit or using mediation for neighbors with issues around recreational vehicle parking.
But resident Ian Karpel countered that mediation doesn’t work without a law that sets limits.
“I’m not anti-RV,” he said. “It’s putting reasonable limitation on these RVs.”
Contact Camera Staff Writer Amy Bounds at 303-473-1341 or boundsa@dailycamera.com.


Posted by lafayettelooney on June 18, 2008 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Again, the city creating a new law where none is needed. Current code enforcement can be used if the RV is creating a safety issue - it’s none of the city’s business what residents park on their own property.
Posted by J_Dawg on June 18, 2008 at 8:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is needed for those who do not live in covenant controlled communities, which can regulate RVs. Those of us who live in non-covenant controlled areas of Louisville need some legal guidelines to help maintain property values and aesthetics.
Posted by bobmobber on June 18, 2008 at 11:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
>>> Those of us who live in non-covenant controlled areas of Louisville need some legal guidelines to help maintain property values and aesthetics.
No you don't.
Posted by phredzepplin on June 18, 2008 at 12:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If you can afford the toys and gasoline to haul and operate them, you can afford storage for the toys as well.
Recreational toys are ugly eyesores that detract from neighborhood aesthetics.
This law should be stronger and ban all toy parking for items taller than 6' and require the rest to be completely shielded behind standard fencing.
Posted by backrange on June 18, 2008 at 3:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
phred - be careful recommending laws against "ugly eyesores". Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Maybe some people think the car you drive is ugly, or your house paint color, or ?????
Posted by jbird on June 18, 2008 at 4:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Those of us who live in non-covenant controlled areas of Louisville need some legal guidelines to help maintain property values and aesthetics."
No we don't - thank you Bobmobber.
Maybe this is why some of us chose to live in non-covenant controlled areas of Louisville in the first place. And the property values are doing just fine on their own lately, thank you.
Posted by thecondoguy1 on June 21, 2008 at 2:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with zepplin, if you can afford equipment of the sort store it at a storage facility, get it the H out of my site thank you, it's junk to me, you may have paid 300 grand for it, but it is still junk.................
(Requires free registration.)
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Camera staff does not actively monitor comments. If you believe a comment breaks the user agreement, please flag the comment and someone will take a look at it.